Tires Tires everywhere, not a single one to race

After 5 successive successful years of F1 Grand Prix racing in the US, yesterdays GP at the Indianapolis circuit turned out to be a farce for the ardent F1 fan. As most of the media is screaming out, yesterday could be marked as a black day in the history of F1 racing.

Background: The FIA has allowed a couple of tire manufacturers to provide racing tires for the cars that compete in F1 racing. These high tech tires have different specs and compounds depending on the race track, the weather conditions and other countless number of parameters. Michelin and Bridgestone are the 2 rival tire manufacturers in F1 racing currently. Michelin partners with 7 teams, 2 of the teams (Renault and McLaren) leading the constructors championship points tally in this season. Bridgestone collaborates with the other "top" team i.e. Ferrari.

The new regulations, enforces teams to use a certain set of tires for the entire racing weekend. Teams are not supposed to change tires or bring in new tires other than the designated set during the course of the entire racing weekend (qualifier and the race). If teams change tires, they would be penalized. However there are exceptions to this rule. A team can change tires if any tire is punctured or it is beyond race use (highly ambiguous :)). Teams can also change from slicks to wet weather tires depending on the weather conditions.

The race weekend at the Indianapolis racing circuit did not begin as expected. Friday practice saw Ralf Schumacher in his Toyota crash out at Turn 13 by hitting the wall before the start-finish straight. This is his second accident in consecutive years at the same turning. He withdrew from the race after the accident relinquishing his position to team member Ricardo Zonta who faced a similar plight on the turn. The reason for these accidents were not clear and Michelin tire samples were flown to France (Michelin headquarters)

The Problem: Michelin engineers analyzed the samples from the friday accidents and put forward a statement on Saturday apologizing that the tires supplied to the teams would not last the race distance for the Michelin runners (70% of the racing cars). Michelin and the racing teams met to decide on the possible mitigation strategies for this problem and put forth the following proposals in front of the governing body.

1. Airlift fresh set of tires from France the would be safer to race
2. Reduce the speed on Turn 13 by introducing a chicane there

The FIA verdict: The FIA ruled out option 1. Once the rules have been set, they cannot be bent to accommodate a technical defect. This would be unfair for the Bridgestone teams who have done well to get all the technicality figured out right. The FIA rules would also lose respect as teams could exploit similar situations in the future and the FIA would be obliged to provide exceptions in those circumstances. The FIA ruled out option 2 too. The regulations set by the FIA doesn't allow tracks to be modified once practice and qualifying is done. Further if a chicane is introduced on turn 13 was there enough time to do a safety analysis of that part of the circuit? There are rumors that 9 out of the 10 teams agreed for this proposal, but the proposal was rejected by the Ferrari team as they felt that their car could handle turn 13 well and it would be unfair for them, if a chicane was introduced. There are also reports that the proposal was accepted by F1 boss Bernie Ecclestone, but was vetoed by Max Mosley, president of the FIA. It is a well known secret that F1 racing is basically divided into 2 groups, 1) the 7 Michelin teams (that plan to break away in 2008) and 2) Bernie, Max and the Ferraris.

The FIA made a proposal to the Michelin teams that they should regulate the speed at turn 13 for all their cars or change tires frequently during the race incurring a penalty for each tire change.

Michelin and their teams stand: The 7 teams collaborating with Michelin rejected the FIA proposal. When a driver is racing, the team management cannot control the racing instincts of a driver at a particular turn and ask him to go slowly. It would also be an unfair advantage for the Bridgestone runners if the Michelin cars were going slowly in that turn. Citing both driver safety and competitive advantage for opposition, all Michelin runners decided to boycott the race after the formation lap unless their proposal of introducing a chicane was accepted. This standoff led to only 6 cars racing on the circuit to the disappointment of all the fans who had gathered there.

The Result: A disappointed and irate crowd started pelting water bottles and beer cans as the Ferraris made mockery of the Jordans and Minardis to finish one-two. Many F1 fans left the circuit moments after the red lights went off. There were demands for ticket refunds. Michelin, FIA and the teams were booed for their respective decisions. There was no victory celebrations on the podium except for Montiero and the Jordan team.

Montiero's Jordan finished 3rd much to the delight of the Portuguese driver and the Jordan team. I was very disappointed with Narain's performance though he ended up in the points (How he did that is a no-brainer :)).

My Opinion: I think Michelin should take most of the blame for the fiasco. I am quite happy that the FIA didn't bend any of their rules. Having said that they should look into revising their regulations by making it a little less rigid. I have heard that there are plans of enforcing a single tire manufacturer for F1. After this incident, I am sure Michelin wouldn't be the obvious choice. Whether it is the right solution, I am not sure.

I see the predicament of the teams in boycotting the race. The team management is morally bound in protecting the safety of its drivers against hazardous conditions and giving them the best equipment to compete. Once Michelin came up with a statement that their tires were not safe to race on, the team managers were obligated not to run the cars. Whatever said and done, the F1 fan is the one who is going to be bitterly disappointed. I know people who have traveled from far off place to view the race, only to see a six car- one sided race. Their loss cannot be compensated.

The Winners:

• Champ car and other US racing events. The popularity of F1 would definitely decline in the US. There are rumors that F1 would move out of US once the Indy contract ends. There is also news that the F1 tickets can be used by racing fans to attend a Champ car event, which would improve its popularity in the country.
• Bridgestone. The Bridgestone tire manufacturer is going to benefit from Michelin's debacle. If the FIA plans to have a single tire manufacturer for F1, Bridgestone is going to be the frontrunner
• Ferrari. The former world champion team is already on par with the 2nd place McLaren team this season with Michael Schumacher close on Kimi's heels after yesterday's race. This means that they now have a realistic chance of defending their world championship title. They have got a foot in the door. Will they be able to take advantage of this? Time will tell.
• Minardis and Jordans. The back markers for F1 got their chance to be among the points and also on the podium :). Another fact is that both the Minardis and Jordans are now ahead of BAR Honda (0 points), a front runner team.

The Losers:

• The F1 fan: Millions of fans worldwide, were disappointed with yesterday's race. I even heard reports that TV channels stopped broadcasting the race once they saw that only 6 cars were competing. Most of the fans who actually came to watch the race would have spent hundreds of dollars to get a glimpse of their favorite teams and drivers.
• F1 Sport: Already there are reports that US would not be a racing circuit in the next season because of the losses people have incurred. Globalization of this sport would take a big hit after this incident.
• Michelin: Since yesterday, Michelin stocks have already taken a dip. Lot of damage control needs to be done by this tire manufacturer. Michelin has already apologized for the technical problem, but feel justified that the Michelin runners didn't take part in the race. Michelin has argued that they have been honest and open in letting the teams know of their defects and in keeping the safety of the drivers their primary goal. An accident would probably have them entangled in a expensive law suit in an US court that would cost more than the losses they have incurred by not letting their cars race.
• Michelin Runners: The 7 Michelin teams not only lost their points and advantage in the world championship, but also they may have to shell out huge amounts of compensation along with Michelin to the angry American fans depending on how things turn out. Advertising is an important revenue generator for F1 teams and after Sunday's debacle, the teams may have to pay back the ad amount they had taken for the race. The net loss for the Michelin teams could be in the order of millions of USDs

share this: facebook